Overview
Osisko Metals Incorporated is a Canadian company primarily engaged in the exploration and development of base metals properties, focusing specifically on zinc and lead. The company holds significant projects in Canada including its key assets: the Pine Point Mining Camp located in the Northwest Territories and the Bathurst Mining Camp in New Brunswick. Pine Point is a historical mining site where Osisko Metals works to revitalize and further develop its potential through modern technologies and exploration methods. In contrast, the Bathurst Camp offers growth through its strategic positioning in a region known for base metal deposits. Together, these projects underscore Osisko Metals' dedication to enhancing Canada's position in the global base metals market, aiming at environmentally conscious and economically viable extraction and development practices.
AI+ Ask Fintel’s AI assistant about Osisko Metals Incorporated.
Thinking about good questions…
Basic Stats
The share price of Osisko Metals Incorporated as of 5 September 2025 is 0,25 € / share. This is an increase of 2.46% from the prior week. The market cap (or net worth) of Osisko Metals Incorporated as of 5 September 2025 is 151,26 € MM.
The Factor Analysis chart (below right) shows a view of Osisko Metals Incorporated from a variety of lenses. Each factor shows how well the company ranks against all other companies in the Fintel global investing universe. Factor scores range from zero to 100, with 100 being most desirable, and 50 being average.
For example, a company with a Value Score of 100 would be the most undervalued company in our database. A company with a Value Score of zero would be the most overvalued.
| Market Cap | 151.26 MM |
| EV | |
| Shares Out. | 609.94 MM |
| Earnings Date | |
| EPS (TTM) | -0.05 |
| Dividend Yield | |
| Ex-Dividend Date | |
| Borrow Rate | |
| Short Shares Avail. | |
| Short Interest | |
| Short Float | |
| Days to Cover | |
| Risk Free Rate | 4.17 % |
| Price Change (1 yr) | 96.83 % |
| Volatility (1 yr) | 0.84 |
| Beta | 0.88 |
| Sharpe Ratio (1 yr) | 1.10 |
| Sortino Ratio (1 yr) | 2.22 |
| PE Ratio | |
| Price/Book | |
| Price/TBV | |
| Book/Market | |
| EBIT/EV | |
| EBIT(3yr avg)/EV | |
| ROA | -0.20 |
| ROE | -0.29 |
| ROIC | -0.13 |
| CROIC | 0.37 |
| OCROIC | -0.03 |
| Implied Volatility | |
| Put/Call OI Ratio |
| Growth | 69.69 /100 |
| Profitability | 43.97 /100 |
| Quality Score | 47.60 /100 |
| Value Score | |
| Momentum Score | 33.39 /100 |
| Stability (Low Vol) Score | 17.43 /100 |
| Analyst Sentiment | |
| Fund Sentiment | |
| Insider Sentiment | |
| Officer Sentiment | |
| Dividend Score | |
| QVM Score | |
| Piotroski F-SCORE | 3.00 /9 |
Factor Scores range from 0 to 100, with 100 being most desirable. Larger circles are better. In situations where we have no data (e.g. no insider trades), we plot the score at 50 to avoid penalizing companies. However, a company that does not pay dividends will get a Dividend Score of Zero. Additionally, we inverted volatility to create a "stability" metric which is better when higher.
Stock Upgrades/Downgrades
This card shows analyst upgrades/downgrades for Osisko Metals Incorporated. An analyst rating is a classification that gives investors a sense of analyst sentiment about the direction and performance of an equity - usually a stock - over a period of time, typically 12 months.
The standard analyst ratings are generally as follows:
- Buy/Overweight/Outperform - Any of these ratings conveys an analyst’s belief that the stock is likely to outperform a market index (e.g. the S&P 500).
- Hold/Equal-Weight/Market Perform - Any of these ratings conveys an analyst’s belief that the stock is likely to perform in line with a market index.
- Sell/Underweight/Underperform - Any of these ratings suggest that an analyst believes the stock is likely to underperform a market index.
When an analyst upgrades a stock, they are signaling that the company’s fundamentals are being undervalued by investors. It could also mean they believe the market is underestimating the company’s potential. The opposite is true when a stock receives a downgrade.
The average rating of each individual analyst’s rating is the consensus rating for a stock. This gives investors a broader sense of the overall sentiment for that stock.
| Date | Analyst | Prior | Latest Recommendation |
Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No data available. | ||||
